Misuse makes PSA ‘revolving-door detention’ system: Amnesty

Home » Kashmir » Misuse makes PSA ‘revolving-door detention’ system: Amnesty

By GNS on 13/06/2019.

Misuse makes PSA ‘revolving-door detention’ system: Amnesty

Srinagar, June 13: Amnesty International has said that authorities in Jammu and Kashmir are frequently misusing Section 19 of the PSA to issue repeated detention orders, creating a “revolving-door detention” system.

“Authorities frequently misuse Section 19 of the PSA to issue repeat detention orders to keep people in detention for prolonged periods,” Amnesty said in a report which was actually to be released by it in Srinagar but were “barred by the authorities.”

Section 19 states that “there shall be no bar to making of a fresh order of detention against a person on the same facts as an earlier order of detention” where the earlier order of detention “is not legal on account of any technical defect” or where the order “has been revoked by reason of any apprehension, of for avoiding any challenge that such order or its continuance is not legal on account of any technical defect.”

“The authorities frequently issue repeat detention orders on the same grounds as earlier orders, arguing that the earlier orders had been quashed on “technical grounds” even when they were quashed on substantive grounds,” it said in the report mailed to media. “This then contributes to creating a “revolving-door detention” system, where detainees whose PSA orders are quashed are immediately detained again under fresh orders on identical or similar grounds,” it says, according to GNS.

Referring to a case of one Abdul Rashid Rather, amnesty said that he was arrested in November 2016 for allegedly organizing violent protests and throwing stones at government forces, and was detained under the PSA a few days later. In September 2017, the J&K High Court quashed the order, stating that Rather had not been informed that he had a right to make a representation to the detaining authority, it said. However, Rather was not released, and was instead “implicated” in another criminal case, the Amnesty said.

“In October 2017, he was detained again under a new PSA order, which stated that the earlier one had been quashed on “technical grounds”. Amnesty has referred to numerous other cases.

Loading...